Corporate LitigationJoseph M. McLaughlin and Yafit Cohn, Delaware Business Court Insider
Demand Requirement Under Exchange Act §14(a)
In their Corporate Litigation column, Joseph M. McLaughlin and Yafit Cohn, of Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, examine 'In re The Home Depot, Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation', which weighed in on a recurring question regarding the demand requirement on which courts have differed: whether pre-suit demand is required for claims alleging a violation of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. 'Home Depot' is the latest in a series of shareholder derivative actions arising from high-profile data breaches to be dismissed in recent years, with the court holding that Delaware's demand requirement applies equally to Section 14(a) claims.
This premium content is reserved for Delaware Business Court Insider subscribers.
Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.
Already a subscriber? Log in now